Showing posts with label rhetoricalterms. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rhetoricalterms. Show all posts

Selzer, Jack. "Rhetorical Analysis"

Selzer, Jack. "Rhetorical Analysis: Understanding How Texts Persuade Readers." What Writing Does and How it Does it. Bazerman & Priori.

In chapter 10, Selzer examines rhetorical analysis, a broad methodological term that usually falls into two categories or approaches:
  1. textual: use of rhetorical terminology on a singular symbolic act, taken on its own terms
  2. contextual: examining a particular act as it fits into a larger chain or conversation
Thus, it is important to note, that rhetorical analysis involves reading or interpreting symbolic acts or words.

Key peeps:
  • Aristotle
  • Quintilian
  • Cicero
  • Barthes
  • Burke
Key terms for textual analysis (classical):
  • audience
  • forensic rhetoric--characteristic of courtrooms; concerning actions done in the past
  • deliberative rhetoric--characteristic of legislative forums; concerning future course of actions
  • epideictic rhetoric--ceremonial discourse used to create and reinforce community values; concerning present moment
  • five canons--actions of a rhetor from planning to delivery; see next five terms
  • inventio--finding/creating of info and planning 
  • dispostio--arrangement
    • exordium--introduction
    • narratio--forecasting
    • confirmatio--proof
    • refutatio--refutation
    • peroration--conclusion
  • elocutio--style
  • memoria--recollection of rhetorical resources one could call upon and memorization of what has been arranged
  • pronuntiatio--delivery
    • elocutio--stylistic maneuvers (antithesis, irony, hyperbole, metaphor, epanalepsis, antimetabole and anacoluthon)
  • ethos--trustworthiness and credibility of rhetor
  • pathos--reasons that derive from a communities deeply and fervently held values
  • logos--sound reasons that emerge from intellectual reasoning
  • invention
Key terms for contextual analysis (classical):
  • emotional appeal--the pathos used
  • argument by example--where a single case stands in for many cases (how is this different than synechdoche)?
  • details--not merely concrete description, but also hard evidence
  • anastrophe--violation of normal subject/verb/object order
  • parenthesis--distracting interrupters
  • hypotaxis--modifying or subordinate clauses
  • parataxis--independent clauses that begin with "and" or "but"
  • isocolons--precise mirror-image parallel structures
  • hyperbole--exaggeration for emphasis or for rhetorical effect
  • irony--expression of something which is contrary to the intended meaning
  • allusion--direct or indirect mention of figure or event
  • metaphors--implied comparison achieved through a figurative use of words
  • connotations--emotional charges of words
Key terms for rhetorical analysis (Burkean or modern)
  • dramatistic pentad--elements to identify before engaging in analysis; elements represented by questions
    1. act--What purposeful act has taken place?  
    2. agent--Who took this action?
    3. agency--How or with what did they do it?
    4. scene--Where, when and in what context did the act take place?
    5. purpose--Why did they do it? What was their intent? (usually done after the first four)
  • identification--for persuasion to work, one identifies with another, either a self or objects
  • consubstantiality--humans have symbolic understanding of themselves and others; to share knowledge, people align their personal symbol-system with another's symbol system
  • interpretive screens: terminology itself
Main claims:
  • rhetoric is both a productive and interpretive enterprise (280)
  • rhetorical analysis can be understood as an effort to understand how people within specific social situations attempt to influence other through langauge (281)
  • rhetorical analysis is a form of critical reading (281)
  • textual and contextual analysis are not mutually exclusive (302) 
  • specific rhetoric performances are an irreducible mixture of both text and context (302)
  • as Burke demonstrates, rhet analysis can in and of itself be a part of an unending process (303)
Challenges Selzer poses:
  1. try to use elements of both in an analysis to understand rhet event more completely
  2. remember (and perhaps make an explicit note of?) the limits of the analysis, it is always somewhat partial and incomplete, ready to be deepened, critiqued, modified and extended by others